The Roots of Total Productive Maintenance
Beginning in the 1950's with early missile programs, the Department Of Defense sponsored a new science called Reliability. Reliability is the science of maintenance. It uses statistics and failure theory to measure, understand and improve the performance of equipment and maintenance. Reliability theory can guide engineers as they design and test new equipment. After equipment has been in service, reliability data tells the maintenance engineer how to improve its performance.
As the Gulf Wars demonstrated, this science has produced outstanding results in defense. Regrettably, little of this knowledge has found its way into industry. Most maintenance operations still operate on the principal of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". This breakdown theory of maintenance generates several undesirable effects:
Breakdowns occur at the worst moment-- when a customer is waiting, process timing is important, or when people are standing by. This unplanned downtime is far worse than intended downtime. Breakdowns often cause collateral damage that far exceeds the original problem. For example, a $38.00 roller bearing on a plastics extruder fails. The resulting misalignment of the shaft destroys the gears and the pinion shaft, three other bearings and an oil seal. The sudden stoppage causes plastic to freeze in the barrels. The total cost is about $13,000 plus three days of lost production. A routine inspection using vibration analysis or even the touch and hearing of an experienced mechanic could have prevented almost all of this loss.
Breakdowns are one of many reasons for excessive inventory buffers. Such inventory allows other production to proceed while the breakdown is fixed. But this inventory is expensive. Moreover, there are other associated costs such as space, tracking and insurance. At least 75% of quality problems have a maintenance component. This causes customer dissatisfaction, scrap and further bloats inventory.
Phantom capacity, the difference between theoretical capacity and actual output is often the result of maintenance problems which generate downtime, scrap and scheduling difficulty. Some plants have as much as 40% phantom capacity.
Accounting systems rigorously capture the direct cost of maintenance. They rarely capture the costs of non-maintenance such as those above. The graph shows how total cost varies with the level of maintenance. The left side of the curve reflects a "breakdown" maintenance strategy, i.e., maintenance effort is assigned only when equipment fails. As the level of maintenance moves up, effort is made to regularly service equipment.
1- No action until equipment fails
2- Routine service-- oil and grease
3- Inspection and preventive repair
4- Equipment Re-Engineering
5- Predictive Maintenance
The key to excellence in maintenance is a good system of metrics. Some of the key metrics are:
Quality teams will find many issues that involve maintenance. The technical tools such as Pareto Diagrams, Ishikawa Diagrams and control charts are valuable diagnostics and indicators. Combined with the metrics and tools of Reliability they help the maintenance department permanently solve problems.
Initially, maintenance personnel should be members of problem-solving teams. When the company has fully re-structured, these people may become part of Self-Directed Work Teams. Maintenance will also form internal teams to examine their internal processes as well as specific equipment problems where maintenance issues dominate.
As the above elements come into place, the maintenance organization should change. More maintenance tasks are taken on by the operators and users of equipment. The centralized maintenance department takes on a new mission which emphasizes:
Specialized expertise that does not fit easily into operating units
Setting minimum standards for metrics and reporting
Training
Common Spare Parts Stocking
Information Technology has made rigorous use of maintenance metrics easy. Many maintenance software systems exist. They can assist in almost every area of maintenance. The track spare parts, compile time and costs, track metrics, schedule work and analyze vibration. But a software program does not guarantee good maintenance performance. Software cannot compensate for a lack of fundamental knowledge. In many cases, software has harmed maintenance efforts by diverting resources and delaying action on the true causes of non-performance.
Competitiveness and Profitability are the goals of our work. Maintenance can and should be a prime contributor. We can help you select the appropriate elements from TQM, BPR and other innovative programs and successfully implement them in your operations. A well executed drive towards maintenance excellence can:
Achieve Availabilities Of 90%-98%
Reduce Failure Rate 50%-90%
Increase Capacity 10%-30%
Improve Quality
Reduce Frustration
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
SEP 2007 |