Alternatives to "Line Balance" Algorithms
Work balance within a manufacturing cell or work cell is a primary determinant of the cell's efficiency and one of several workcell design issues. Work balance is a lot more involved than most people recognize. This page introduces the topic and the downloadable paper addresses these issues in considerable detail.
Henry Ford's highly balanced assembly line has been the dominant production model for almost 80 years. But such lines have significant problems. Most short-cycle lines that appear to be balanced actually have significant balance losses that exceed 20%.
Imbalance can produce several negative effects. Among these effects are:
|
|
Production lines can have perfect average or static balance and yet be highly unbalanced from cycle-to-cycle (dynamic balance). Understanding these factors is important when selecting balance methods.
In Cellular Manufacturing it is important to divorce people from machines or workstations. This is often a difficult paradigm shift but it is necessary for three reasons:
1. The time required for a person at a given workstation may differ from the machine time.
2. The workstations in a work cell or production line rarely have perfect balance and therefore most workstations have idle periods.
3. People are more flexible than machines and can utilize balance methods that are unavailable for equipment.
Balancing equipment is often unnecessary or even counterproductive. There are important advantages from excess equipment capacity in a work cell. The following methods are available for equipment balance:
Balancing the work of people in a cell is critical. An idle person costs more than most idle machines. In addition, people perceive a work imbalance as unfair and this causes frustration and dissension in the work cell team. Here are the methods available for balancing people:
LEE, QUARTERMAN, "How to Balance work cells", Institute of Industrial Engineers, Proceedings, May 21-23, 2000
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
SEP 2007 |